Poaching proposes a threat to wildlife population and is the same as stealing form law abiding hunters. So it is very surprising that such a pro-hunting state has introduced a bill that would strip Wildlife Officers of a very important tool.
The clause HB 110 eliminates, is referred to as an “exception clause”- a clause that
The 4th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects against unreasonable search and seizure. If an IDFG Officer, or any law enforcement officer, violates the 4th Amendment, courts can settle the matter. The existence of the exception clause does not allow officers to violate the U.S. Constitution
I tried to find the rational for the change to the